![]() These programs just have a different method of displaying the information to the user. So the things is, that these new processors do jump to the temps you're seeing in all of these programs! NONE of them are wrong. But Ryzen Master would show a constant cool 40C or so with no jumping around. We all have established that Ryzen 3000 series processor have a tendency to incur 8-10C temp jumps on idle which you would be able to spot with MSI afterburner or HWinfo or even with just your motherboard debug led panel(displaying temps obviously). ![]() I know the issue you're facing and have a better way to understand the same. ![]() Well the real question is "What program to trust?" and "What numbers should I use if I consider tuning my cooling system even more: AB/HWInfo's peak numbers or Ryzen Master's peak numbers?" from 57C to 67-70C, from 65C to 75-80C, even things like Cinebench or Prime95 didnt show temps that high). What is more interesting, in stress tests there are no temp spikes, a stable 75C line (probably, because it's around the same core clock and voltage), but in games (when there is always a micro autoboost of cores to 4200) Ryzen Master reports smth like 57-65C almost straight lines with rare (once 3-5 minutes when a new location is loading) spikes to 70C while soft like MSI Ab shows the spikes like in idle that happen every 2-3 seconds or so (e.g. MSI AB reports spikes from 55 to 65 while Ryzen Master draws an almost straight 55C line). MSI Afterburner and HWInfo64 show massive (7 to 12C) temperature spikes with temp slowly going down after them whereas Ryzen Master shows the minimal temps inbetween those spikes (e.g. ![]() The problem is: 3 progs report different temps for my CPU. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |